ExplainableIntelligence.

For Complex Industrial Systems

Manufacturing organizations generate vast volumes of data — from machines, sensors, production systems, and enterprise platforms. Yet most operational decisions are still driven by manual analysis, delayed reports, and fragmented insights.

On-Premise DeploymentOT/IT IntegrationRoot Cause AnalysisExplainable Insights

Genovation converts operational data into decision-ready intelligence — without disrupting existing systems.

INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE
OT Layer — Operational Technology
PLCs / SCADASensors / IoTMES / HistorianQuality Systems
IT Layer — Enterprise
ERP / SAPData WarehouseDocument Mgmt
Mentis OS
Data IntegrationIntelligenceExplainability
Decision Makers
OperatorsEngineersPlant MgrsExecutives
INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE

OT Layer

PLCs · Sensors · MES · SCADA

IT Layer

ERP / SAP · Data Warehouse

Mentis OS

Data Integration · Intelligence · Explainability

Decision Makers

Operators · Engineers · Leadership

Intelligence must earn the trust of the floor before it reaches the boardroom.

The Challenge

The Reality of AI
in Manufacturing

Data Is Abundant, Insight Is Not

Plants generate data continuously, but insights arrive too late, without root causes, or disconnected from SOPs.

Dashboards show what happened. They rarely explain why.

Operational Trust Matters

Production decisions affect safety, quality, throughput, and cost. Unexplainable AI recommendations are rarely accepted.

The floor needs to trust the insight before acting on it.

Infrastructure Constraints

Legacy systems, OT-IT separation, and on-premise requirements are the norm. Cloud-centric AI often fails to fit.

Many AI solutions can't meet manufacturing realities.

Traditional BI vs. Explainable Intelligence

Traditional Dashboards

Shows metrics after the fact
No root cause explanation
Disconnected from SOPs
Requires analyst interpretation

Genovation Intelligence

Real-time explainable insights
Automated root cause analysis
Tied to process context
Natural language answers
Our Approach

Every Data Source.
One Intelligence Layer.

Manufacturing knowledge lives everywhere — in sensor streams, PDF manuals, maintenance logs, quality reports, and tribal expertise. Genovation consolidates structured and unstructured data into a unified intelligence layer without forced rip-and-replace.

MENTIS OS — DATA INGESTION & CONSOLIDATION
Unstructured

SOPs & Work Instructions

1,247 documents

Quality Reports & NCRs

Free-text, images

Maintenance Logs

CMMS entries

Engineering Guides

OEM specs

Shift Handover Notes

Operator observations

MENTIS OS
Document Intelligence

Parses PDFs, scanned docs, images. Extracts procedures, parameters, thresholds.

Cross-Source Correlation

Links sensor anomalies to maintenance history, quality observations to process parameters.

Contextual Reasoning

Insights grounded in both real-time telemetry and institutional knowledge.

Source Traceability

Every insight traces back to its source document, sensor, or log entry.

Structured

Sensor & IoT Streams

Vibration, temp, pressure

Historians & Time Series

OSIsoft PI, InfluxDB

MES & SCADA

Production orders

ERP / SAP

Orders, inventory

Quality Management

SPC, inspection records

360° Operational Intelligence
· Root Cause Analysis· Predictive Insights· Natural Language Q&A· Full Source Traceability

Reads What Humans Write

Ingests PDFs, scanned documents, spreadsheets, operator notes, and engineering manuals. No manual tagging required.

Connects What Systems Can't

Correlates a vibration spike with a maintenance log from last week, a quality NCR, and the OEM bearing spec — automatically.

Deploys Where You Need It

On-premise, private cloud, or edge-adjacent. No data leaves your network. Respects OT-IT boundaries.

Intelligence in Action

See It
Working.

360° Operational Intelligence — Press Line 4 · Bearing Anomaly Investigation
Live

"Why is Press Line 4 vibrating above threshold and what should we do about it?"

Live Sensors
Vibration V-4014.2 mm/s ↑

Threshold 3.5 exceeded

Motor Temp78°C ↑
Power Draw12.4 kW ↑
Retrieved Docs

MAINT-LOG-4847

"Slight vibration noted during PM check, bearing within spec but trending"

— J. Torres, 12 days ago

OEM-MANUAL-P4 §7.3

"Replace main bearing when vibration exceeds 3.5 mm/s for >24h"

NCR-2024-0892

"Dimensional drift on parts from Press 4"

— QC, 3 days ago

AI Synthesis

Root Cause — 87% Confidence

Main bearing degradation. Maint log from 12 days ago confirms early detection. OEM manual §7.3 specifies replacement at current threshold.

Connected Evidence

Sensor trend: bearing wear signature
Maint log: early warning 12d ago
NCR: quality impact already visible
OEM spec: replacement threshold met
Time to failure48-72 hrs
Decision

Schedule preventive maintenance within 24 hours

Planned downtime4 hrs
Unplanned failure$47K
Preventive cost$3.2K
Net savings$43.8K
4 structured sources · 3 unstructured documents · Full audit trail · ID: PRS4-2024-1847
View complete reasoning chain →

Live sensor data feeds directly into the analysis pipeline

Maintenance logs, NCRs, and OEM manuals retrieved and reasoned over

AI correlates all sources into a single explainable root cause

Actionable recommendation with cost impact and audit trail

Plant Performance — Line 3

87.3%

OEE

92.1%

Availability

94.8%

Performance

98.2%

Quality

OEE Below Target (90%)

Root cause analysis identified 3 contributing factors:

Conveyor belt misalignment
42 min
Material feed rate variance
-3.2%
Batch 2847 quality hold
18 units

Recommended Actions

Schedule conveyor inspection per SOP-M-142. Review material supplier variance from Batch 2840-2850.

Operational Performance

Not just metrics — explanations. Every KPI comes with an AI-generated root cause linked to specific process events, sensor readings, and SOPs.

Auto-generated OEE breakdown

By availability, performance, and quality

Root cause tied to process data

Sensor logs, CMMS records, quality events

Recommendations linked to SOPs

Specific procedures and document references

Process Knowledge

Ask questions in natural language. Get answers grounded in your actual SOPs, work instructions, and safety procedures — with source citations.

Natural language SOP access

No more searching through binders and PDFs

Safety notes auto-surfaced

PPE requirements and hazard warnings inline

Always current revision

Outdated or conflicting procedures flagged

Process Knowledge — SOP Query

What's the procedure for clearing a jam on the packaging line?

Per SOP-PKG-023 (Packaging Line Jam Clearance):

1.STOP: Press E-Stop and wait for full line halt
2.LOCKOUT: Apply LOTO per SOP-SAF-001 §4.2
3.CLEAR: Remove jammed material, inspect for damage
4.VERIFY: Check alignment sensors before restart

⚠ Safety Note: PPE required — safety glasses, cut-resistant gloves (Class 5)

SOP-PKG-023 Rev DSOP-SAF-001 §4.2
Quality Intelligence — SPC Monitor
Alert
DIMENSION A — Bore Diameter (mm)OUT OF CONTROL
UCLLCL
Samples 1-15 · Line 3 · Shift ARule: 7 points trending upward
ROOT CAUSE

Tool wear on Station 4 cutter (2,847 cycles vs. 3,000-cycle spec from OEM-MANUAL §5.1). Temperature compensation masking drift.

AFFECTED

5 lots · 240 parts

ACTION

Quarantine initiated

Quality Intelligence

SPC monitoring meets AI. Detects out-of-control conditions, correlates to process parameters, and recommends containment.

Trend and rule violation detection

Western Electric rules applied automatically

Root cause across data types

Links SPC drift to tool wear, maint history

Batch genealogy and containment

Affected lots identified and quarantined

Executive Decision Support

Ask questions in plain language across all plants. Get answers backed by source records — not summaries of summaries.

Multi-turn conversational Q&A

Follow-up questions refine the analysis

Cross-plant comparison

Performance contextualized across sites

Cost impact quantification

Maintenance backlog vs. failure cost analysis

Executive Intelligence — Multi-Plant Overview

Why did Plant 2 miss target last week?

Plant 2 missed production target by 4.2% last week:

Line 3 conveyor issue-2.1%
Unplanned maintenance — Press 7-1.4%
Batch 2847 quality hold-0.7%

Plant 1

+1.3%

Plant 2

-4.2%

Plant 3

+0.8%

PM schedule review recommended — last service 23 days overdue per SOP-M-142.

Anomaly Root Cause Investigation

When an anomaly is detected, Genovation reconstructs the entire time window — surfacing concurrent failures, correlating across data sources, and synthesizing actionable insights.

Root Cause Investigation — Line 3 · Anomaly Window: 06:00–12:00
Investigation Active

Anomaly Trigger: OEE dropped to 78.4% — 12 points below target

Scanning sensor data, maintenance records, quality logs, and engineering documentation.

CRITICAL
Event Timeline

06:00

Shift start — normal ops

06:47

Conveyor misalignment

42 min

08:12

Vibration spike V-401

4.2 mm/s

10:33

Quality exceedance

Bore OOC

11:32

OEE drops to 78.4%

Correlated Evidence
SENSOR

Vibration V-401 trending since Nov 3 — bearing wear signature

MAINT LOG

"Slight vibration noted during PM" — J. Torres, 12 days ago. No WO created.

OEM MANUAL

§7.3: Replace bearing at >3.5 mm/s for >24h.

ERP

Batch 2847 supplier: density variance +0.3% vs. spec.

Root Cause

Primary: Cascading mechanical degradation

Bearing wear on Press 4 caused progressive vibration, inducing conveyor tensioner stress leading to misalignment at 06:47.

Contributing: Material variance

Batch 2847 density variance (+0.3%) narrowed tolerance margins, pushing bore diameter out of control.

Process Gap Identified

Maintenance observation from Nov 3 was logged but no corrective WO generated. SOP-M-142 §3.2 requires WO creation for any vibration trend.

Actionable Insights
IMMEDIATE

Replace Press 4 main bearing

Failure within 48-72h. Cost: $3.2K vs. $47K unplanned.

SHORT TERM

Replace Station 4 milling cutter

At 2,847/3,000 cycles. Schedule with bearing PM.

SYSTEMIC

Close WO generation gap in SOP-M-142

Recommend mandatory WO trigger for vibration trends.

Reconstructs the full timeline around an anomaly to find concurrent events

Correlates sensor data, maint logs, quality NCRs, OEM specs, and ERP records

Synthesizes root cause across failures — not just one event, the full causal chain

Prioritized actions: immediate fixes, short-term corrections, systemic improvements

Platform

Built for
Industrial Environments

Deployment
On-Premise
Private Industrial Networks
Edge-Adjacent
Integration
Historians & Databases
Existing ETL Pipelines
No Rip-and-Replace
Explainability
Measurable Variables
Clear Reasoning Paths
Audit Trails

Explanation, not just visualization

Insights that answer "why", not just "what"

Designed for OT-aware environments

Respects operational technology boundaries

Respects infrastructure investments

Works with existing systems, no forced replacement

Builds trust across roles

From operators to engineers to leadership

Adopted where credibility matters more than novelty.

Who We Work With

Typical Stakeholders

Plant Managers

Operations Leadership

Industrial Engineering Teams

Supply Chain & Procurement Heads

CIOs & Digital Transformation Leaders

How We Deploy

Deployment Approach

Manufacturing engagements typically begin with:

Defined Operational Use Case

Clear scope and measurable objectives

Controlled Pilot Deployment

Validated on selected lines or processes

Integration with Selected Data Sources

Historians, databases, document systems

Phased Expansion

Across plants or functions based on results

All deployments prioritize continuity of operations and system reliability.

Engage
With Us.

If your organization is exploring AI adoption across industrial operations and requires explainable, deployable intelligence, we welcome a conversation.

"In manufacturing, intelligence must earn the trust of the floor before it reaches the boardroom. Genovation is built for that reality."